photos
- There is a permanently visible affordance (button) to indicate where the user can tap to move it. It is the dark, pale blue droplet below the cursor in the image above. The cursor instantly jumps to wherever the user taps on the block of text.
- The cursor and magnifier are visually unified to simplify targeting the right word or letter.
- You can select a word by dragging, then pausing, then pressing harder. No more double tapping, and fewer instances of the formatting menu popping out.
- Women — a sexist can become President
- minorities — a racist can become president
- global warming — looks like coal is coming back, Tesla is going down
- Anti-establishment — from the Tea Party in the US to Dieudonné in France, it looks like anti-establishment types do not realise they are a necessary part of the system and that they're not substantially changing anything. An illusion, really. Radically changing things will require blood/violence and Trump/Brexit is not what they're looking for (You Are Not So Smart)
- the democratic party — Hillary was a bad candidate, at least badly timed; mired in scandals, a technocrat/establishment figure (I believe Bernie would have won, he was a guy and a populist)
- liberal democracy — Fukuyama's End of History... maybe one of the most tunnel-visioned idea of all time is now officially (and thankfully) dead; the FT still published a piece by Francis though
- experts, pundits — they failed to predict Brexit, Trump, the FARC vote in Colombia... what's next?
- pseudo-intellectuals — West Wing-watching, glasses-wearing, Sciences Po-attending people have lost a lot of political relevance (that includes me)
- Good as in Good vs. Evil — thinking that Clinton was “good” and Trump “evil” is a very relative/ambiguous notion that has little substance. The world is a multifaceted gem and not a binary, black and white system.
- Pollsters and Nate Silver — his model was flawed, see Nassim Taleb's rebuttal (that I don't understand but a lot of mathematicians seem to agree with him, including this blogger). Only 10% of people responded to polls. Polls are flawed.
- the Truth — lying will not prevent you from getting elected, we truly live in a post-factual world + in the social media world, truth is irrelevant for filter bubbles rule over the content you consume (NiemanLab)
- White rural voters — the most important demographic in US elections
- Twitter — losing users and cash, yes but increasing in relevance (Slate)
- Facebook — people are starting to realise that instead of being a reflection of the complex world we live in, Facebook serves opinions that reinforce your world view. The revelation will weaken Facebook in the short term but my guess is that we enjoy scrolling through the News Feed more than we dislike this fact (TechCrunch)
- conservative politics — a Republican-controlled Congress is going to make things much less liberal
- The Republican party — the media narrative was that the Republican party was undergoing a civil war, turns out it's okay
- the peculiar American democracy — so only 25.5% voted for Trump, 45.6% did not vote and 25.6% for Clinton... only in America the third most popular person can be elected. And that's thanks to this beautiful thing named the electoral college
- Peter Thiel — the Silicon Valley VC who supported Trump will be part of the transition team and help prioritise policies (Bloomberg)
- Russia — to take with a pinch of salt for Putin said mending relations is going to be hard and long (Washington Post)
- China — Trump's purported isolationism could pave the way for a new hegemon
- racists — a racist can become President
- sexists — a sexist can become President
Eloquent is a New Paradigm for Mobile Text Editing
Editing text on mobile is cumbersome.
If people make a mistake, they would rather delete a word than attempt to edit it. This is why I was so interested in Eloquent's solution as it addresses the problem directly. Watch the intro video here.
It improves the current text editing experience in three ways:
If an Apple engineer reads this blog, please consider trying some of these interactions.
Why We Like Bitter Foods In The 21st Century
Why is it that humans seem to increasingly enjoy bitter foods?
Examples include IPA beer, Aperol (sales have increased x5 from 2010 to 2022), or 100% cacao chocolate.
One theory is that people have been acribing better health outcomes to things that are hard to like, like bitter foods, in opposition to sweet stuff. This is because sugar is now universally considered as something bad for your health, and is very easy thing to eat.
Another possibility is that we turn to less palatable foods because they are perceived to be more natural. Nature yields unsavory stuff, right?
Of course, the venerable mango is a compelling counter.
Beautiful Lidar images of rivers. Courtesy of Dan Coecarto.
Butternut squash sweets. With the taste of family tradition and centennial know-how. Tripoli's souk, Lebanon
Mosaïque du Bon Pasteur, 5-6 B.C, representing the fauna of the Levant, National Museum, Beirut, Lebanon
On the design of doors from Don Norman’s book, The Design if Everyday Things.
It doesn’t get mightier than this. Wara2 3enab or stuffed wine leaves, cooked for 20 hours with delicious lamb.
This is the Lebanese take on mloukhiye. The name in English is jute mallow (or Corchorus olitorius). The dish is made with boiled mloukhiye, poached chicken and lamb, white rice, red onions and vinegar. It’s delicious.
Beit Douma, Lebanon
Lux Noctis is a beautiful, zero-trace series of photographs
What’s zero-trace land art?
Recently Wu has evolved his process of working with the drones to form light paths above topographical peaks in the mountainous terrain. “I see it as a kind of ‘zero trace’ version of land art where the environment remains untouched by the artist, and at the same time is presented in a sublime way which speaks to 19th century Romantic painting and science and fictional imagery,” said Wu to Colossal.See more photos over at the source link.
[Source: LUX NOCTIS]
Inside the Black Market for Spotify Playlists
Fascinating reporting by Austin Powell:
There’s just one catch: King essentially paid to be added to those Spotify playlists. He’s one of countless artists who have compensated curators to check out his tracks—or in the case for some of his contemporaries, to be added to specific playlists—to gain valuable streams and attention.
[Source: Daily Dot]
How do waveforms work?
Josh Comeau, a software developer at Khan Academy has created a beautiful, interactive tutorial that explains how waveforms work. Click on the source link to discover it!
[Source: Let's Learn About Waveforms]
Blade Runner-style photographs capture Tokyo's infrastructure
Click on the source link to see more.
[Source: Blade Runner-style photographs capture Tokyo's infrastructure]
Why Google Maps is years ahead of the competition
Justin O’Beirne, former head of cartography at Apple, explains why Google Maps has a multiple year advantage on the competition.
Basically, it’s about the structures/building footprints Google can display thanks to their satellite imagery and Street View efforts. Nobody else has this level of precision.
Bye Apple Maps!
Here’s another example:
[Source: Google Maps’s Moat]
No, tailgating doesn’t get you where you need to go faster
A study published on Thursday (Dec. 14) in the journal IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems uses mathematical simulations to show that tightly following a car in front of you will only worsen traffic jams. Instead it proposes that drivers adjust their position based on both the car in front and behind to keep traffic flow smooth. This small behavioral tweak could as much as halve commute time on certain roads.[Source: MIT researchers have developed a new algorithm for cars that could halve congestion — Quartz]
Potential EU leaving names
Building upon the Brexit neologism, a clever Reddit user imagined what other countries could use.
Trump Trump Trump Trump Trump
So no one told you life what gonna be this way...Disclaimer: this post contains the word “fuck” multiple times. Also a lot of links.
Frantically refreshing Twitter at 4am, I thought to myself: “Is Florida going to do it again?”
Looked like it: 91% in and Trump was 100 000 votes ahead.
Crap cake! I woke up and the NYT’s headline was all: Trump Triumphs.
What the fuck happened?
What can we understand from that? how can we prevent such people to rise to the top in other countries? (I’m talking to you, chère France).
We’ll first get an overview of the situation by analysing how some people/institutions/ideas have changed in status. I’ll then try and summarise a few lessons and predictions for the future. Finally, I rounded up some interesting articles and very succinctly summarised them.
Losers
Why Trump won, the succinct edition
Trump won thanks to his anti-establishment message that appealed to the most important demographic: white rural voters (an op-ed by Bernie Sanders in the NYT). Wisconsin, Michigan and Pennsylvania were blue states in the past elections. Hillary didn’t even campaign in Wisconsin.
There is a growing (and now critical) discrepancy between said white rural voters and urbanites. The media reflects only the life of the latter. Globalisation and multiculturalism don’t sit that well for that key demographic. So take that, add increasing economic inequality and a clever electoral strategy and you have President Trump.
Trump did not want to be President
Trump is fucking clueless as to what a President does. Actually, he didn’t want to be President. He doesn’t even want to live in the White House (NYT). And he suddenly loves Obama and longs for his wise counsel (CNN on Facebook).
Now, he has to become a politician.
Being anti-system is great for the campaign. But once you’re elected and they give you the CIA file thanks to your newly-acquired security/intelligence clearance, you realise that this whole shit is a bit more complicated than you originally thought.
(By the way, if you’re interested in America’s “deep secrets” with regards to intelligence, this piece casually published in the Washington Post probably won’t relax you (it’s a spine-chilling experience, how can they write that the CIA topples governments so shamelessly?)).
Will Trump aggressively pursue his campaign pledges?
I don’t know but let’s venture some guesses for the fun of it.
Based on the transcript of his 60 Minutes interview (CBS News), Trump’s campaign persona is being replaced by a more subdued and serious discourse. He appears to be willing to compromise greatly (with regards to gay marriage or prosecuting Hillary for instance). To my eyes, it looks like he’s realising now what it means to be President and he naively feels like he wants to do well. He was saying all these fucked up things to get elected.
When he talked to Obama about the Middle East, he noticed the U.S. paid 6 trillion dollars in the last 10 years there. To Trump’s eyes, this is too much and he’s saying “look at our roads and our bridges”.
If by any chance, Trump decides to use this kind of money to rebuild America and stop militarily intervening across the world, that would be nice, wouldn’t it? Am I being too naive myself?
On the the other hand, Paul Ryan is now strengthened to carry out the Republican agenda. Who will impose his will on the other?
Also, Trump’s chief of staff will be Reince Priebus, the head of the RNC. An establishment figure who will probably soften some of the strongest Trump ideas. The Cabinet will set the tone for Trump’s administration and here’s the NYT’s shortlist. Since the NYT can’t predict shit, it’s a non-binding read.
So will he build the wall, repeal Obamacare or ban muslims from entering the United States? Very, very hard to say, despite all that we’ve read about that already and what Trump is saying right now. It’s not as if he could simply click on some buttons and watch the magic operate. My personal bet is that none of these dramatic things will take place, the institutional homeostasis being too strong (crash course on homeostasis).
The liberal reaction
There’s California wanting to secede from the Union (TechCrunch). An isolationist and privileged response coming from a supposedly open-minded community. Although the electoral college, two-party system is not particularly democratic, this ain’t either. Doing exactly what Texas wanted to do when Obama was reelected in 2012. They truly do live in a bubble.
Then you have people from major cities across the U.S who are protesting. Oddly enough, Trump won fair and square: did he cheat? He is a fucked up human being. A liar, a sexist, a racist. Protesting against him is an understandable short-term move but how will you prevent him from being reelected in 4 years? Why was he elected in the first place? Let us understand the problem and only then, we’ll find a solution.
Short-term problems
Short-term problems that may become long-term are the vindicated crazy, criminal people of the United States who are going to feel free to do whatever comes across their minds. Trump is their president and so they’re going to have the license to do all kinds of fucked up things to people they don’t like. You can check out Shaun King’s Facebook Timeline for info.
What can we do?
A quick word about sharing news on Facebook. Please stop sharing “dramatic” news events on Facebook to voice your outrage. The more you share, the more media outlets will produce clickbait dramatic news for you to share. Anyway, the people who follow you on Facebook already have the same opinions as you! It’ll make you feel better but it’s a sterile, vicious cycle (Read Nicky Case’s post about that, she’s got some great insight).
Instead: act politically. Volunteer. Experiment. Do something concrete.
Trump took advantage of the economic and cultural situation. The narrative must be reversed. There must be a way for a liberal platform to reach white people’s hearts and minds without sounding naive or weak. Sanders 2020?
The situation in France
Marine Le Pen has slimmer chances of being elected because of the nature of the French electorate as well as the political system. However, Hollande, Juppé, Macron and Valls are representative of the unease white rural voters feel. Quite cleverly indeed, Sarkozy positioned himself as the more legitimate candidate on the right. His anti-establishment message is inspired by Trump (whom he congratulated) and he’s not on the Front National so he’s a better choice than Marine for most French people. Marine will have the best macroeconomic timing imaginable so the political offer must be at least as appealing as she is. Today, it looks quite dire.
Further reading
My former professor shares some insights as to what lies have been demolished since Trump was elected: Sick Chickens.
Why pollsters were wrong [spoiler: low response rates]: Harvard Business Review.
Democrats, Trump, and the Ongoing, Dangerous Refusal to Learn the Lesson of Brexit [favouring of the elite by institutions, accurately analysed by Glenn Greenwald]: The Intercept.
The media’s epic fail [Trump and Brexit as entertainment, the media chased clicks and gave him a lot of free coverage]: The Bureau of Investigative Journalism
Donald Trump Victory: how to tackle the new “nationalist international” [create a progressivist international]: Newsweek
Donald Trump is moving to the White House, and liberals put him there [American liberals are complacent and thought this was going to be an easy win/took the ethical “higher ground” that backfired]: The Guardian
Are you addicted to your cell phone?
A superb illustrated read about your (and mine) smartphone addiction. You should read it all, it's on Nautilus.
Pro tip: reward yourself “variably” when doing an analog (i.e not tech) activity such as seeing friends or walking outside. By variably I mean don't reward for a 1:1 ratio. The deal with Facebook is that you scroll aimlessly and then at some point you're going to get a notification but you don't know when. This motivates you to scroll more than if they gave you a reward (notification) every time you scrolled.