Daft Punk’s fourth studio album, “Random Access Memories,” is an attempt to make the kind of disco record that they sampled so heavily for “Discovery.” As such, it serves as a tribute to those who came before them and as a direct rebuke to much of what they’ve spawned. Only intermittently electronic in nature, and depending largely on live musicians, it is extremely ambitious, and as variable in quality as any popular album you will hear this year. Noodly jazz fusion instrumentals? Absolutely. Soggy poetry and kid choirs? Yes, please. Cliches that a B-list teen-pop writer would discard? Bring it on. The duo has become so good at making records that I replay parts of “Random Access Memories” repeatedly while simultaneously thinking it is some of the worst music I’ve ever heard. Daft Punk engages the sound and the surface of music so lovingly that all seventy-five loony minutes of “Random Access Memories” feel fantastic, even when you are hearing music you might never seek out. This record raises a radical question: Does good music need to be good?

Does good music need to be good?

Peculiar requests from traveling Britons to the Foreign Office

Peculiar requests from traveling Britons to the Foreign Office

The three types of specialist

The three types of specialist

IDEAS: Are blasphemy, sexuality, and excrement the main themes all over the world?

MOHR: As far as I know, they’re mostly the same with a little bit of regional variation. In Arab and Spanish-speaking Catholic countries, there’s a lot of stuff about mothers and sisters. But it’s pretty much the same.

A cool interview with Melissa Mohr, author of Holy Sh*t: A Brief History of Swearing, with the Boston Globe. 

They investigate the origins and disparities of swear words across the globe. 

This is a 7-minute long workout that has been scientifically designed to optimise your exercise session. It also only needs you, a wall and a chair. 

See source to read more about this. 

The success by a team at Oregon Health and Science University puts human “therapeutic cloning” back on the scientific agenda as a potential source of stem cells for regenerative medicine, after a few years in which attention focused on other methods that seemed easier to achieve.

The research may also revive fears about the birth of human clones, though the Oregon scientists insist that their work could not be used for this purpose.

“Our finding offers new ways of generating stem cells for patients with dysfunctional or damaged tissues and organs,” says Shoukhrat Mitalipov, senior author of the study published in the journal Cell. “Such stem cells can regenerate and replace those damaged cells and tissues and alleviate diseases that affect millions of people.”

Drones and clones. I’m eagerly waiting for the debates that are coming on the ethics of cloning for health purposes. 

Scientists in human cloning breakthrough – FT.com

Drones and Silicon Valley, an early marriage

Drones and Silicon Valley, an early marriage

Facebook is pseudo-reinventing emoticons

Facebook is pseudo-reinventing emoticons

Jimi Hendrix, jamming with Miles Davis sent a telegram to Paul McCartney in 1969 as he thought it would be cool that they jam all together, with Tony Williams at the drums.

Unfortunately this never happened.